Genre: Social Criticism along with some political criticism
Purpose: The author argued that we can not apply Western values to everyone. Michael Kurtz is a writer who mostly talks about civil rights issues. In his paper he tries to show that it is ignorant and unfair for people to push their beliefs on others. He urges the audience to move out of their ignorance and to learn more about other cultures.
Central Message: We must look past superficial judgements, which are “mistaken and dangerous,” not force our culture on the Middle East, and allow for the gradual modernization of the Middle East.
World View and Assumptions: Kurtz sees the political process as a better option than violence or force. He believes in equality but within the context of each culture. Kurtz thinks that no culture is better than the other, just different. Kurtz assumes that different cultures try to improve other people by spreading their beliefs. He assumes that people are ignorant of certain aspects of foreign cultures, and because of their ignorance, force their beliefs on others.
Use of Tools/Evidence: Kurtz calls on examples of the past (Iran and Afghanistan ) to make his point clear. He takes the counter-arguments and gives evidence that disproves them (poverty leads to terrorism). Kurtz explains Muslim tradition using reasoning that is sensible to a Western audience(tribe and family loyalty as a reason for veiling). He points out contradictions in the counter-argument (the ignorance of the Western claims that veils are forced on the women).